The UK's Finest Video Channel for Switched On Men

Login | Register

games: FEAR 2 - Project Origin

It’s been a while since Alma has first brought her clichés of pasty skin and greasy hair Japanese horrors to us all in the form of First Encounter Recon, which is a thoroughly enjoyable shooter with a convenient abbreviation. It picks off where the original left off with a bang.

The levels of fear are extremely complicated and unless you’ve played the first game, you may not know what the hell is going on. Thank God the developers have scattered a lot more “intel” throughout the levels to help fill in the blanks.

The levels may be a little grey and although there isn’t much in the way of things to do (apart from walking around a corridor and killing everything in sight) Fear 2 does at least have slo-mo bullet time and hallucinations. If watching someone smoke on TV makes you crave a cigarette, then Fear 2 might just make you crave a sheet of LSD.

This sequel fixes some of the shortcomings of the first game – you’ll get to explore the town that was blown up in the original and ride around in one of Armacham’s mech suits for a couple of levels.

Alma has been released from the prison of amniotic fluid where she spent the first game and thankfully, if you couldn’t care less who Alma is or why she’s on your back so much, it’s still a great solid shooter performance.

The story is great with some cleverly revealed twists…you’ll just have to play and see. The script is pleasantly surprising too and the banter in your squad is enough to make you like them- before they’re sliced up by a needle and dragged into Alma’s brain dimensions.

Project Origin isn’t breaking any moulds. As generic as the fighting action has become it’s a game that’ll stick with you, for the storyline and the ending. If you can take the old-school gameplay, keycards and all, Fear 2:Project Origin gets 4 stars!

For the best of the rest:

Gamesblog:
The first FEAR taught me to be very frightened of little girls. The second FEAR has taught me that those little girls often grown up to be weird naked women of pure evil. I guess that’s a good lesson to learn.


PCAdvisor
The first FEAR shocked gamers with horrific imagery, bloody shootouts, and razor-sharp action sequences. The series is most notably known for the little girl in a red dress, and it was later revealed that this little girl, Alma, had powerful psychic abilities that could destroy the world.

Gamespot
The image of a pasty-skinned, greasy-haired young girl has become an iconic one in horror films like The Ring, and the original F.E.A.R. introduced a similar figure with great success. Of course, that game gave its ghostly visions a chilling context, drawing you into the unnerving story of a paranormal prodigy named Alma and the horrific suffering to which she was subjected. F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin returns to this fertile universe, but rather than scrutinize even darker reaches of the soul, it merely skims the surface, offering up a series of eerie visions without delivering a good mystery to bind them together. The good news for shooter fans is that the bullet-blasting core of the experience is sound, propelling you forward with enough intensity to keep the single-player campaign engaging. Most of what’s here has been done better before, but the unspectacular elements have been stitched into an enjoyably moody first-person shooter that relies on rock-solid mechanics rather than true inspiration.

comments

Joey
January 22nd, 2009 - 8:01pm

The FEAR 2 Demo came out today. I got mine and it’s awesome! I got it from filefront

http://files.filefront.com/FEAR+2+Project+Origin+PC+Demo/;13056438;/fileinfo.html

Tom
January 22nd, 2009 - 9:08pm

Where’s Katherine gone?

Cordelia
January 22nd, 2009 - 10:02pm

Katherines gone and Zoes in and shes doing an awesome job.

Loved this episode, specially the beginning.

Carrie
January 23rd, 2009 - 3:25am

Lose the fake portrait background.

Ruzaki
January 23rd, 2009 - 3:55am

I will admit, I don’t like the fake portraits.

January 23rd, 2009 - 7:07am

Awesome review Zoe - you made me smile the whole way through :)
Looks like your hitting your stride only 2 reviews in!

em
January 23rd, 2009 - 10:24am

for the first time since I started watching CFGames, you guys actually made me cringe with embarrassment. I think you’ve completely misjudged your audience here. Katharine wrote and delivered intelligent, varied reviews to a late 20s viewer with a brain. And you’ve replaced her with a robot, who seems (whether it’s true or not) that she’s reading a badly written script. Badly written by someone else. I could do with out the stupid sexual references and dodgy acting and stick to tell me what’s good and bad about the game.

Well, I say that, but I won’t be watching anymore. I wish you luck Zoe, but I certainly feel you’re simply a puppet here now. Particularly as I don’t see any responses from you on the boards. Good luck.

StevenG.
January 23rd, 2009 - 11:26am

Em - I think that’s harsh. I concede that this isn’t like Katharine’s stuff, but you can’t blame the ambition. Yes, a risk was taken with this episode and it might not be to everyone’s liking but…at least they took the risk.

Kim
January 23rd, 2009 - 12:43pm

I totally agree with em. If I wanted stupid sexual references and dodgy acting and stick, there are plenty of other internet sites that still do it better. I don’t think that it is unfair to compare Zoe to Katharine to some degree, as the popularity of this site is based on her many qualities.

Ian
January 23rd, 2009 - 12:45pm

Em - While not pulling any puches, I’m afraid has broadly gotten it right.

Although, unlike Em I will give it a couple more chances before I become a considerably more intermittent visitor.

Richard
January 23rd, 2009 - 12:57pm

Having watched the first episode and now the latest iteration I have to say that my fears have been confirmed. I completely agree with everything that Em has posted. Whether the case or not i feel that the presenter has absolutely no connection with gaming/reviews what so ever and this has been masked with poor acting and vulgar displays.

Worryingly it would appear that Channel Flip have looked to capitalise on the popularity of the AVGN, who is amazing, but CFG was different and always drew me back.

January 23rd, 2009 - 1:21pm

Talk about slinging mud Em, you are totally blowing it out of proportion, YES there is room for improvement, I dont think they wanted to create a Katharine clone. So they shifted the style completely

I did however find that she complemented Elma, she pulled off her character pretty well, its not shockingly bad…..

Zoe, ignore this trivial banter, I have a feeling once ChannelFlip gets all the bugs out of your system, you will indeed be less Data and more C3PO.

crootza
January 23rd, 2009 - 1:58pm

I think you should all cut the poor girl some slack. Judging by her age she is clearly quite new to this and I think she is doing really well. I hate the way people dont see to care about the actual games anymore, but instead just slate the way they are presented.

Nix
January 23rd, 2009 - 2:20pm

I think Zoe is doin a gr8 job and ppl should just stop being sooo pathetic by moanin and complainin (like em) ! Good luck to Zoe cos i think u did really well! :)

Kim
January 23rd, 2009 - 3:51pm

Re: podza, crootza and Nix. Just go to the porn sites betweens games.

Zoe Cornwell
January 23rd, 2009 - 4:14pm

Hey fellow gamers!
For those of you who have been supportive and enjoyed the shows so far, thank you. Things can only get better…
For those of you who haven’t been impressed yet, you will be. Give me a chance and I will prove some of you angry gamers wrong.
I mean, you don’t start playing a game, complete the first level and then just give up before you’ve even got going do you? I should hope not anyway!

Now, I know some of you are upset about Katherine and I appreciate that’s why a lot of you watched the show but I’m here to take her place and I’ll do my best to write reviews and present the show in a way that can appeal to everyone.

Now, let’s stop with this crazy banter and concentrate on reviewing those games. After all, isn’t that what this show is about :P

em
January 23rd, 2009 - 4:31pm

Zoe. that IS what the show’s about. Exactly. Reviewing games, so why ‘fluff it up’ with mindless tat.

And I apologise, only for not making it clear that I would never expect a replacement for Katherine. That would be a silly and stupid move by CFG. But what seems to have happened is in effect replacing an interesting meal at a slightly upmarket restaurant, with a night out at Kebab Shop (and by that reference I mean content, not persona - I don’t know Zoe, she could be wonderful, but as a product, this is… childish. Therefore whoever is ‘directing’ this, needs… a good restaurant guide).

Zoe Cornwell
January 23rd, 2009 - 4:46pm

Well unfortunately Em, it’s very hard to please everyone ESPECIALLY when you’re new at something. Some people like upmarket restaurants and some people like Kebab shops…Everyone is different. I’m sure you understand that.
Saying that, I totally understand where you’re coming from in wanting less ‘fluff’ and i’ll do my best to ensure my reviews are more to the point in future. However, I don’t see the harm in having a little ‘fluff’ here and there just to liven things up a little and appeal to the more ‘kebab’ types out there.
I personally think it’ll be nice to have a bit of both so i’ll see if i can find more of a balance.
Thanks for your comments though, I’ll try and combine both the upmarket restaurant idea with the kebab shop and we’ll have to wait and see what the outcome is! Hopefully it’ll be the perfect menu :)

Zoe Cornwell
January 23rd, 2009 - 5:55pm

CD, there is no need to be rude…

Enoch
January 23rd, 2009 - 6:10pm

Whoa, mud fight ensuing? Zoe’s obviously reacting to the more usable of the comments here, so give her some time, some more practice, ffs. Slander is certainly not going to improve the show in any way. The informative parts on the game were, after all, very useful, I think that cannot be denied.

Kim
January 23rd, 2009 - 7:31pm

I would like to mention something on the positive. I did like the content of your reviews. I felt that some of the \fluff\ got in the way. I would like to hear more of what you have to say about games. I look forward to your next review.

Josephine Valkenblaster
January 23rd, 2009 - 8:23pm

em. i think its been made clear that you dont have the simple will to accept change.

If anyone is a ‘robot’ perhaps its you…

Maybe its normal to pointlessly comment personally on someone else’s work, i mean, you’re clearly making the world of difference to peoples lives with your genious comparison of food and games.

Ruddy genious.

Give this girl a break and let her get on with, what i think, is a welcome change to this website.

Katherine’s gone. She aint coming back. Get over it.

Long live Zoe Cornwell!

faz
January 23rd, 2009 - 8:27pm

Well done Zoe, I think you’ve done a wicked job!
I think people need to remember that its only your second show and youre still getting into the swing of things! Stop bloody putting the poor girl down!
Also i agree with ‘crootza’ what happened to the games being the main focus! pah!

Wayne Naylor
January 23rd, 2009 - 8:43pm

Hey everyone slating zoe, that is extremely stupid and short sighted in a way seeing as this is her second review. Progress comes over time and so far I think zoe is doing a good job. She highlighted the problems and and showed us the pros. This different from what katharine did with channel flip and we all miss her but I don’t think she would want us on here giving zoe a hard time for being herself and doing the show the way she feels it would make it refresh rather than a mimmick of katharine’s style. I think you have done quite well for only two reviews and I will continue to watch and see you improve zoe. Keep up the good work and just work hard and you will have my support as well as many others. As for F.E.A.R 2 that game looks very creepy but I am mostly in it for that fear element, not to mention the nail gun and slow mo.

Cordelia
January 23rd, 2009 - 8:58pm

Wo wo wo now children lets play nicely. Its Zoes First time at the Channel Flip school and some children are not playing fairly. To the bullies, give it up, what are you trying to achieve here? Shes doing an amazing job and all you do is criticise. Surely we should be encouraging her, I found the review a refreshing change - she made me laugh which is more than Katherine did.

You know the saying Different strokes for different fokes.

Give her a chance and then we can get on with talking about the games, which is what its all about right?

Cherie
January 23rd, 2009 - 9:44pm

Well done zoe thought this was a brilliant review! Dont realli understand what this whole thing is about but I enjoyed watching you and wanted to give u some support!
U looked so scary but your review was really well put together and you presented it well keep up the good work doll! Ur brill dont worry about this katherine kid haha! xxxxxxxxxx

January 23rd, 2009 - 10:59pm

The simple fact that you’ve managed to get more comments here (whether positive or negative) with your 2nd review than Katharine did with most of her reviews is proof enough that you belong here Zoe, as your garnering conversation & debate, which is what this comments section is for after all :P

I for one am genuinely looking forward to what you do next - any hints on what games are up for review?

I would love to see a review of the recently released The Maw for Xbox Live Arcade!

Spence
January 23rd, 2009 - 11:40pm

I really do believe that some of our comments here are just grasping at straws. Many are grasping at the same straws. In point of fact, there is an interesting sort of continuity to the negative reviews here that I think is worth a bit of consideration.

I don’t claim to be the on the strong side of the Rubicon when it comes to perception but I’ve seen plenty of porn and even a few saucy period films (like The Other Boleyn Girl and Shakespeare in Love) and I see no sexual “just go to porn sites betweens games” material presented here. Sure there was a sex slanted joke or two but it’s not like she’s Andrew Dice Claying. Lets see, we had the finger innie outie thing, the “touchy feely” comment and perhaps - if you like - the chair spin cause you could see her legs… that’s about 8-15 seconds out of about 177 or approx 8% of the video for those who are counting - hardly a significant or noteworthy bit of the review.

As for the fluff, come the ass on people! AVGN, Gametrailers, ScrewAttack, Gamespot and yes even our beloved Kat Fletcher have done their share fluffisodes in the past. Zoe Cornwell is hardly the first game reviewer to put on a costume or play schtick. What sort of misanthrope would begrudge the new kid that?

It seems that we’re looking to stretch our jaded, complacent, angry post modern college grad/whinerbaby muscles on the noob. So we just dip into our lexicons and fish out as many common pejorative adjectives for general pop culture issues and attribute them to Zoe in a manner that places them just close enough to her actual qualities to make for a tangible argument. It’s a sad little game that we forum commenters play much too frequently.

In my humble opinion Zoe did a fine job. The review was insightful, clever and in a couple of spots funny. Sure she could have been more relaxed but as all the other supporters have said: its her second bloody review.

Jimi
January 24th, 2009 - 12:06am

Give the woman a break, she’s just started. Zoe has done more than a fine job already, and we should all breathe a sigh of relief that Katharine was replaced by somebody who appears completely capable of the position. Good job so far and good luck.

em
January 24th, 2009 - 12:23am

Josephine. My posts were constructive. And I’m happy to see Zoe can also see that. As I said, I don’t know if Zoe is nice or pure evil incarnate, it is not the point here. Replacement of Katharine for Zoe is not it either. The point is… I prefer an informed and intelligent review. I’m also open to having fun, believe it or not :) yes I am.

Here it is in one simple, non-rude, not pointing fingers at anyone, line…. it all feels very detached and unbelievable with the spaces filled in by bad finger-play actions.

Zoe. I’m just not a Kebab type, even when drunk :) sorry.

Please and Thank you (see, not rude)

Match
January 24th, 2009 - 11:08am

not bad a review, I’d say, especially considering it’s just her second go at it.
I don’t really care for all the fluff and the fake background, just as em I think it simply gets in the way and leaves the impression it’s just there to fill the gaps.
But hey, those reviews aren’t exactly hours long and there is definitely room for improvement, so I’ll just keep watching them, hoping for the best.

Peter
January 24th, 2009 - 4:39pm

Well I think I might give it another couple of watches but this is a bit of a sorry affair with the poor script and stuff although the FEAR acting at the start was pretty funn till the old sexual abuse joke. Sorry if I can’t laugh at the thought of a 9 year old being abused by soldiers.

Half-Life 2 a corridor shooter ummm perhaps I played a different version sure it’s a linear path but it’s in no way a corridor shooter.

As for stokes having a nervoud break down during the game that’s to give you the sense of you’re the last sane person meaning if you go mental yourself thats it nothing left. Having a sane voice in your ear would distinctly give me the impression that there’s still hope still someone in control and thats what Monilith want to avoid.

I loved the FEAR 2 demo and will be preordering the gamewhen Steam start selling it apparently I can stand the GoW style gameplay. Come to think of it that statement annoyed me more than I thought GoW is super generic and despite it’s legions of fans brought nothing to shooters that wasnt there before in various games. Honestly that kind of stuff just makes it appear as if you don’t know what your talking about especially considering Gears is as 3rd person shooter aswell.

January 24th, 2009 - 7:20pm

Hmm, I don’t think Zoe is terrible, just needs to warm up a little. I don’t mind antics and fun, though I do agree with Em about the childish sexual antics. I enjoy intelligent humor, but I’m not such a big fan of the doodling of bits and such. That kind of thing makes me roll my eyes and think she’s just going for the cheap laugh (like fart jokes in kids movies). Maybe it’s just a fine line of where the maturity sits.

I’m not gonna stop watching, I’d like to give Zoe a chance to do something I’ll find endearing. And as far as the reviews themselves I’ve thought the content was solid so the meat of the show is still there.

Keep at it Zoe, you’re doing well. Just aim a little higher ^.~

January 24th, 2009 - 9:59pm

Hold crap i just played the Fear 2 Demo and it was awesome!

It looks absolutely incredible, it scared the pants of me repeatedly, was dripping with atmosphere the whole way through, and goddamn - stomping around in that armoured battle suit thingy is so much fun!!

I thought this was gonna be ‘meh’ but it is now on my must buy list!

January 24th, 2009 - 10:01pm

And by ‘hold crap’ i of course mean ‘holy crap’ lol
(where’s the effing edit function already guys!?)

Spence
January 24th, 2009 - 11:13pm

I myself have had the same notion with some post GoW shooters both 1st and 3rd. Yes the mechanics used in Gears were nothing new but I would agree that they were - and in my humble opinion still are - the most refined in gaming. Sure you could just use Rainbow Six or maybe Perfect Dark as examples of the sort of gameplay advances Zoe seems to be talking about but at this point we’re just splitting heirs.

RawSteelUT
January 25th, 2009 - 3:50am

Hello, Zoe. Good review, but honestly, I think you’re trying way too hard. The forced sexual innuendo and over-produced horror bits don’t really fit well. You’d be best just being yourself and relaxing. You seem like a cool girl: just calm down and tell the haters to fuck off.

Oh, and the original FEAR did come to 360, as did the expansions (as the standalone “FEAR Files.”)

January 25th, 2009 - 8:15am

There is absolutely no chance at all of me playing this due to my being a complete wuss when it comes to horror games lol

BTW I do agree with the few comments about the innuendo which really doesn’t fit in with the rest of the site imo. Other than that I think you are off to a decent start.

January 25th, 2009 - 9:21pm

Impressed is the word I am looking for, Zoe came across really well, I could watch her all day as I loved her cheeky sense of acting. Bring it on Zoe! More more more…………………….what a wicked sense of humour!

Ryuzaki
January 26th, 2009 - 11:43pm

We’re all being too hard on her, I know, she’s not Katherine, but don’t flame her because of that reason. Also some constructive criticism would possibly be putting the T.V. in the center, so Its easier to see the gameplay.

January 28th, 2009 - 1:36pm

We love the feedback guys, thanks :)

x
January 28th, 2009 - 11:54pm

great review style!

Fox Omega
February 12th, 2009 - 11:07am

I just typed in a search for FEAR Project Origin review, and came up with this video review by this Zoe. I have never been on this site so I don’t know who Katherine is; but I’d like to say as a non-prejudiced-by-prior-experience viewer, it was very entertaining yet informative.
I don’t like to lose my ‘favorite’ personalities on vids either, but Zoe has sold me to come check for video game reviews etc on this site. You are very entertaining Zoe, so I thank you for giving me a smile as I learned some info on a game I now plan to purchase. Thanks again darlin, and no matter what the curmudgeons might say, I had a laugh and the day was a little brighter because of you.
Thanks again… :)

February 16th, 2009 - 7:53pm

Aww shucks, thanks very much Fox Omega :)

add a comment

Subscribe to newsletter?