The UK's Finest Video Channel for Switched On Men

Login | Register

film: Happy-Go-Lucky

It’s not always easy to keep a smile on your face. Especially when you work in a neighbourhood where owning a pitbull terrier is a status symbol. If you’re in need of cheering up, you could possibly consider a viewing of Happy-Go-Lucky.

It’s an award winning film from the slate of Mike Leigh, the master of improvisation and kitchen sink drama. Personally, I thought it was incredibly dull and grossly overrated. But then I am particularly grumpy.

Meet heroine Poppy (Sally Hawkins), possibly the happiest person in the world. She’s so happy in fact that you can’t help but sit in fear waiting for something terrible to happen to her throughout the whole movie. Some kind of secret tragedy has to be unveiled at some stage, right? Wrong.

Now if you’ve ever watched a Mike Leigh film before then you will know what to expect. Gritty attention to detail? Check. Natural acting based on large swathes of improvisation? Check. Stark inner city backdrop? Check. Depressing subject matter deigned to make you cut your wrists in the bath? No check.

Happy Go Lucky is constantly upbeat, courtesy of its lead character. She has already plucked a Golden Globe for the performance in this (and in others) and she admittedly pulls off the ‘aint life marvellous’ stick with energetic aplomb. But God did she, and by extension the whole movie annoy me to death. Life is not as all rosy as hugs with cosy bear, it’s hoodies with knives and idiots playing their iPods on public transport. How can you smile about all these things, even if you are Happy Go Lucky?

But leaving all this aside, the thing that truly offends me about Happy Go Lucky is the lack of a decent story, or any story at all for that matter. Watching this movie is like watching a series of scenes, that for the most part seem to have very little to do with eachother. They’re like dogs that sniff eachother’s arses, but then ramble off disinterested. I know it’s base to satisfy a begininng, middle and end, but thats just the way I am.

For the best of the rest:

Time Out:
Poppy (Sally Hawkins) is a 30-year-old Londoner with a bright outlook on life. She loves her job, she loves her friends, she loves her freedom. Mike Leigh’s new film follows her over a few weeks one spring as she learns to drive and embarks on a new romance.

The Telegraph:
Even from its opening scenes, it is clear that Happy-Go-Lucky is no ordinary Mike Leigh film. Its heroine, Poppy, is seen cycling through London, a contented smile playing on her lips. Sometimes she waves, cheerfully greeting passers-by. The sun-dappled city looks warm, inviting and optimistic. Surely some mistake?

Rolling Stone:
Get ready for Sally Hawkins, a dynamo of an actress who will have her way with you in Happy-Go-Lucky, leaving you enchanted, enraged to the point of madness and utterly dazzled. No list of the year’s best performances should be made without her. You should know right off that this is a Mike Leigh movie. It’s a cheerier piece of business than you might expect from the British provocateur behind Naked, Secrets & Lies and Vera Drake, but nonetheless a movie driven by character. Leigh, brought up in a Jewish immigrant family, has been called a poet of the working class. His scripts come out of improvisation, from what the actors come up with during rehearsals.

comments

Laura
January 19th, 2009 - 6:49pm

I totally agree with this review. I thought Happy Go Lucky was awful. I saw it in the cinema and the person who sat in front of me was eating what I thought was fish and chips but was actually some sort of soft shell crab tempura. The lead character is possibly the most annoying person on film. Her Pollyanna attitude was so extreme that it made me want to gouge her eyes out.

Hadrian'sWall
January 19th, 2009 - 7:13pm

That’s hilarious Laura.
I love the detail about the fish and chips.
What kind of person actually eats tempura in the cinema?
Jeez!

January 19th, 2009 - 10:55pm

I could barely stand that ridiculous ‘happy-go-lucky’ attitude for the 4 mins or so it took you to review it >_<

Also, after that roasting - how the hell could you still give it 3 stars!?
I was sure it was gonna be a 1 star…

Spence
January 24th, 2009 - 11:28pm

In the last 48 hours I’ve just seen the films, Palindromes, and Someone to Eat Cheese With. These films served as a hard reminder of a growing pandemic in independent film.

I’ll preface by saying that I thoroughly enjoyed Juno, I love Lost in Translation, Napoleon Dynamite was very funny and - despite it’s titles warning of obvious hipster fodder - I’m rather looking forward to ” Nick and Norahs Infinite Playlist”. That said, if I sit through another samey, kitsch oriented, indie alt punk folk driven, intentionally low end title sequenced, idiosyncratic indie film I may put myself on a strict diet of MTV and Michael Bay films to balance myself out.

I might just be working under a nostalgia induced - thus poor - recollection of times past, but there seemed to once be a day when you could count on a no budget indie film to be original - or at very least - unusual. Now small film directors have made fortunes, thespian newcomers, reemerging veterans have received acclaim and a market has developed for a particular style of indie. Thus we are deluged with movies that just sort of… well kill time with montages cut to Violent Femmes or perhaps Velvet Underground b sides. These montages show us buildings, people laughing in smokey bars, our protagonists lounging around in odd/unusual places and of course sparsely populated “suburban wastelands”.
These sorts of films tend not to spend much time on story at all.

It’s a sad state of affairs indeed and it looks like Happy Go Lucky may well be just another matching design on a patch of wall paper that was once a mosaic.

add a comment

Subscribe to newsletter?