web: Chickipedia
This Friday, Iyaz and Rob are taking a look at Chickpedia, the online wiki of hot girls. What could be better for the weekend?
comments
July 25th, 2008 - 9:39pm
I agree with Josh. You’re a fine man, Josh. In fact, you’re my hero. I want to be like Josh.
July 26th, 2008 - 12:41am
You just can’t help think that chickipedia doesn’t have the strictest of editorial standards and that mayhaps it is not the definitive source on this kind of thing. Except that blatant errors are easier to spot here than the dubious studies and original research is to spot on wikipedia. If you get the point that my spectacularly bad sentence structure is trying to convey.
July 26th, 2008 - 5:55pm
If i wanted to watch a pair of american idiots i’d tune into revision3. Come on Wil either lose these two or give them there own feed.
July 26th, 2008 - 6:34pm
Schmung — I think you’re right. They need professional editors and fact-checkers. Who would like to go out and confirm the information on Chickipedia?
July 28th, 2008 - 1:44pm
kinda defeats the purpose of a wiki by vetting it, but anywho nice site, don’t think i could complain about pictures of scantily-clad women!
August 4th, 2008 - 9:34am
i agree with paul the episodes are lacking in legnth quality get rid of the two bumbling idiots from across the pnd !!
add a comment
Interesting site suggestion and humorous video.